Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

General of American Intelligence and 9/11

Recommended Posts

Major General Albert Bert N. Stubblebine III, head of all intelligence says: Pentagon NOT hit by a plane WTC 7 brought down by explosives Media in America is controlled

Video interview 6/28/09:

General Stubblebine: I am Major General Albert Stubblebine. I am retired Army Major-General. In my last assignment my last command I was responsible for all of the Armys strategic intelligence forces around the world. I had responsibility for the Signals Intelligence, Photo Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, Human Intelligence. They all belonged to me, in my last assignment.

I was supposed to find out what the enemy was doing, before the enemy did it so that we could take action against the enemy. Thats Intelligence, OK, before the fact. So, we always always rely not on a single piece of data, before we make a statement, but on multiple and the more pieces of data that you have that correlate, the better you know exactly what is going on.

So I have had a lot of experience looking at photographs. I have looked at many, many different kinds of photographs, from many, many different platforms on many, many different countries, around the world.

Interviewer: OK. So on September the 11th, in 2001, what hit the Pentagon?

General Stubblebine:  I dont know exactly what hit it, but I do know, from the photographs that I have analyzed and looked at very, very carefully, it was not an airplane.

Interviewer:  What made you believe that?

General Stubblebine:  Well, for one thing, if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks. So where were they? Did this vessel vehicle, or whatever it was have wings? Apparently not, because if it had had wings, they would have made marks on the side of the Pentagon.

One person counteracted my theory, and said, Oh, youve got it all wrong. And the reason that its wrong is that as the airplane came across, one wing tipped down and hit the ground and broke off. I said, Fine, thats possible, one wing could have broken off. But if I understand airplanes correctly, most airplanes have two wings. I havent met an airplane with only one wing. So where was the mark for the second wing? OK, one broke off there should have been a mark for the second wing. I could not find that in any of the photographs that Ive analyzed. Now Ive been very careful to not say what went in there. Why? Because you dont have that evidence.

I did Ive never believed that it was an airplane since Ive looked at the photographs. Up until the time I looked at the photographs, I accepted what was being said. After I looked at it NO WAY!

We pride ourselves with the free press. I do not believe the free press is free any more. Its very expensive. Its very expensive. And the press is saying what they have been told to say about this.

Now, do I have proof of that? No. But I believe that what is being what certainly the the stories that were told all about 9/11 were false. I mean, you take a look at the buildings falling down. They didnt fall down because airplanes hit them. They fell down because of explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7, for Gods sake. It didnt fall down to its side. It didnt fall to this direction or that direction; just like the two Towers.

When you look at the temperatures that you can create with fuel in a gas tank or a fuel tank of an airplane, and then you investigate the amount of heat that would be required to melt to melt the superstructure of the buildings that came tumbling down, when you put all of that together, the one thing that shows; It does not match the facts. What is it they do not want the public to know?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this