Jump to content

Pentagon 9/11 video to be made public


Recommended Posts

EDIT: Just got done watching the video, what a waste it proves nothing, even the people from the news channel was like all you can see is a sun spot and a blur. It was just some cheap material to throw at the public to get them to shut up for awhile. Just because some people had filed a law suit against them, and they needed something to give them. To me this only proves a conspiracy even more. Why won't they release all the other videos that they have of it? What a waste of a video.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They must be of the belief that our senses are dulled. Let's now see some of the confiscated surveilance footage that got confiscated.

Ya won't even happen. I mean if it was really a plane, why not just show it? What's the big deal?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government is all about lies, smoke and mirrors, and betraying us for "our safety". Another thing is gas. They are just screwing us over to make money. Of course some will say it's a simple case of supply and demand. Bite me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government is all about lies' date=' smoke and mirrors, and betraying us for "our safety". Another thing is gas. They are just screwing us over to make money. Of course some will say it's a simple case of supply and demand. Bite me.[/quote']

Viva revolution! :-D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OKC deal was all a put up job as well. It's all about physics. Truck bombs do not have the energy required to knock out steel reinforced beams at the distances involved. Blast radius. In an explosion, we see the blast as it travels outwards go from millions of pounds per square inch down to 50 to 100 pounds per square inch in a very short distance. General Partin (retired USAF Weapons Engineer) estimated that the column that was furthest from the blast zone experienced 32 psi. Something is not right there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, I heard that the video they released is the best that has been found. They recovered all of the other tapes incase they did contain footage. All of the other "supposed cameras that caught everything" in fact didn't get anything. So the government released what it had. The government is in a loose loose situation cause if it releases footage of tapes that reveal nothing then it will be accused of doctering the footage, and if it releases nothing, like it was doing, it is just the same, more conspiracy theories. Now if they had a tape of a plane hitting the Pentagon, I would hope it would be released ASAP to leave no doubt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cruise missile on average are a little over 20 feet long and 2 feet in diam.. Judging the distance of the explosion on the building, a 20 X 2 object would be alot smaller then the object that is in the frames that are released. Could it be a plane?? who knows, but that plane was traveling fast, would be blurred.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There sure was wreckage

 

http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/13.jpg

 

Even first hand accounts of it.

 

Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive at the Pentagon after the crash and helped coordinate the emergency response. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, CEO of KCE Structural Engineers PC, Washington, D.C. "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?"

 

There are alot more pics here at this site. I tried to link them to here, but the site doesn't allow it. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Lear from abovetopsecret.com forums:

 

"OK. Please know this. I have been a pilot for almost 50 years. No airman has more FAA certificates than I do. I had over 19,000 hours when I retired in 2001, 16,000 in large jets. I have participated in many crash investigations.

 

I have built airplanes, I have flown them, I have instructed in them, I have raced them and I have crashed them. The hypothesis that the wings and tail and fuel from a Boeing 757 disintegrated from the high kinectic energy of impact is pure, unadulterated, unmitigated B.S."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is absolutly correct, who ever said that the wing/tail/ whatever disintegrated? I showed you pictures of debris. Sure you can't see whole sections of the wing or tail but would you really expect too? Considering it wasn't a crash landing at low speeds. Honestly, why would the government release frames of the crash that could be made out as a "cruise missile". If this country really did self inflict these wounds, releasing them would be counter productive if they were trying to cover up something.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pictures of debris that you've cited and shown have been decried as doctored by a good number of authoritative individuals. Therein lies the paradox.

There are also a large number of experts who believe or back just about any crazy idea. Look hard enough and you can always find a well respected nut or two that will agree with whatever it is one wants to prove.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pictures of debris that you've cited and shown have been decried as doctored by a good number of authoritative individuals. Therein lies the paradox.

There are also a large number of experts who believe or back just about any crazy idea. Look hard enough and you can always find a well respected nut or two that will agree with whatever it is one wants to prove.

 

Exactly, you could take any picture and say "its been doctored". Kind of reminds me of the "did we really land on the moon" BS. Its these people who start and carry on these therories that devide this country and turn it on itself.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pictures of debris that you've cited and shown have been decried as doctored by a good number of authoritative individuals. Therein lies the paradox.

There are also a large number of experts who believe or back just about any crazy idea. Look hard enough and you can always find a well respected nut or two that will agree with whatever it is one wants to prove.

 

So by your account, nuts exist on either side of the debate?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.